Top 5 Alternatives to AutoSys in 2023

Workload automation and job scheduling are critical to managing IT infrastructure effectively. AutoSys is one of the prominent choices for organizations looking to optimize their operational efficiency. However, as businesses evolve and IT landscapes become more complex, there is a growing demand for alternative workload automation platforms that cater to specific requirements, user preferences, and budgets.

This article explores the top 5 AutoSys alternatives that have emerged as strong contenders in job scheduling and workload automation. These solutions offer an array of features, integrations, and scalability options designed to meet the changing needs of modern enterprises.

AutoSys Review

AutoSys Workload Automation was developed by CA Technologies (acquired by Broadcom in 2018).¹ It enables users to automate, manage, and monitor complex job processing across distributed environments. It has been in the market since the 2000s.

AutoSys Workload Automation offers a unified view for managing enterprise workloads. Although its functionalities can be extended with other Broadcom products like Automic Automation and Workload Automation Advanced Integration for Hadoop, users have found that it doesn’t completely satisfy their needs beyond its primary role as a mainframe scheduler.

User Ratings:

PeerSpot: 4.1/5 based on 10 reviews.²

G2: 4.4/5 based on 33 reviews.³

TrustRadius: 6/10 based on 3 votes.⁴

Based on these reviews:

Pros:

• Acts as a single point of contact for all business solutions.
• Handling real-time business events is seamless.
• PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-business can be managed with AutoSys.
• Features a built-in fault tolerance.

Cons:

• Report generation is limited. (See Figure 1)
• Lack of cloud integration.
• Focuses heavily on command-line interfaces, which lowers usability.
• With Broadcom’s acquisition of CA technologies, they layed off 2000 of 4837 employees. This produces complications with product support due to mergers and acquisitions in the company.
• Broadcom has 2 WLA solutions: AutoSys and Automic Automation, so there is a possibility that Autosys and Automic Automation may be merged in the future.

Source:PeerSpot⁵

Figure 2: Techincal Analyst’s Review of AutoSys

Top 5 AutoSys Alternatives

Sponsored

1-ActiveBatch

ActiveBatch is a workload automation and job scheduling system that allows IT teams to automate cross-platform processes and job chains. ActiveBatch can automate application workflows across the entire IT environment, including multi-cloud and on-premises environments. It has a low-code drag-and-drop UI that does not require extensive technical skills. (See Figure 2)

ActiveBatch features broad support for connecting with enterprise applications and can perform command-line functions without the expense of usability. That means that the existing open-source job schedulers can be managed or consolidated into ActiveBatch.

Figure 1: ActiveBatch UI

User Ratings:

PeerSpot: 4.6/5 based on 16 reviews⁶

G2: 4.6/5 based on 171 Reviews⁷

TrustRadius: 9.1/10 based on 29 votes⁸

Pros

• ActiveBatch works on nearly any operating system, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, Mac OS, and IBM iSeries AS/400.
• It offers comprehensive scalability and extensibility
• It has a low-code approach 
• Seamless monitoring and managing activities and workflows.

Cons

• While integration with third-party tools and systems is available, the process can be developed. 
• Getting used to the UI and some features and functions requires training.
• Customization options could be improved

2-Redwood RunMyJobs

Redwood RunMyJobs is a full-stack advanced workload automation platform for mission-critical business processes. RunMyJobs is a SaaS platform designed to automate workloads, enabling users to effortlessly integrate various systems and data, regardless of the scale or intricacy of their IT environment. With RunMyJobs, users can connect on-premise and private cloud SaaS solutions smoothly. An on-demand free trial is accessible to interested users.

User Ratings:

PeerSpot: 4.8/5 based on 19 reviews.⁹

G2: 4.7/5 based on 117 Reviews.¹⁰

TrustRadius: 9.5/10 based on 28 votes.¹¹

Pros

• Customizable workflows
• Setting up resilient parallel and dependent processes
• RunMyJobs can seamlessly link to a number of outside/Legacy systems. There won’t be any delays after the job is booked, therefore disruption of the work.
• Has advanced features like dashboards, logging, and a load balancer.
• Supports all browsers.

Cons

• Metric/Stat generation could be improved
• Monitoring, alert service, and reporting could be improved

See their offerings below:

3-JAMS Scheduler

Fortra offers JAMS Scheduler, a solution for job scheduling and workload automation. This software assists organizations in automating, overseeing, and tracking jobs and tasks across diverse platforms, applications, and systems.

JAMS Scheduler enables users to generate, execute, and monitor job streams and workflows, ensuring precise and timely completion of all tasks. It supports multiple platforms such as Windows, UNIX, Linux, and IBM and popular applications like SQL Server, Oracle, and SAP. Figure 2 displays the JAMS User Interface for reference.

Source: Software Advice¹²

Figure 3: JAMS Scheduler

User Ratings:

PeerSpot: 4.5/5 based on 21 Reviews¹³

G2: 4.7/5 based on 142 Reviews¹⁴

TrustRadius: 7.9/10 based on 43 Reviews.¹⁵

Pros 

• Alerting and notification is comprehensive.
• It has built-in native codeless functions and the ability to launch code in any runtime environment when needed.
• JAMS Scheduler offers robust security measures, including access controls, encryption, and authentication mechanisms, to safeguard sensitive data and prevent unauthorized access. These measures ensure the protection and integrity of critical information, guaranteeing its safety.
• Event-driven automation of JAMS assists organizations in enhancing resource optimization and aligning job execution with business priorities, resulting in improved productivity. This approach enables the efficient utilization of resources. 

Cons

• Considering its complex configurations, new users might need substantial time to use JAMS Scheduler proficiently.
• For organizations with simpler scheduling requirements or fewer jobs, JAMS Scheduler might be overly feature-rich, making it less suitable compared to more streamlined alternatives.
• It’s Windows-focused software, meaning other operating systems will have difficulties using its client.

4-Control-M by BMC Software

Control-M is a tool for automating workloads designed to streamline the handling of complex IT operations on different platforms, applications, and databases. It offers several notable functionalities, such as a unified control panel, advanced analytics for future predictions, a user-friendly web interface, and seamless integration with widely used applications like Hadoop, Informatica, and SAP.

User Ratings

PeerSpot: 4.4/5 based on 47 reviews.¹⁶

G2: 4.4/5 based on 55 reviews.¹⁷

TrustRadius: 7.9/10 based on 109 reviews.¹⁸

Pros

• Businesses can have granularity into the jobs then as access is assigned to users based on their roles, allowing the ability to order the job or maybe even just monitor the progress.
• Using AFT, sending files to customers is automated and can be customized for success, failure, etc., allowing visibility into the process for all involved.
• Control-M provides a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes in the organization. 
• Change management for the development cycle.
• Orchestration for batch processes.

Cons

• The interface could be improved.
• Installation and upgrades are not seamless.
• Making mass changes requires time and effort.

5-Stonebranch

Stonebranch provides a workload automation (WLA) tool called the Universal Automation Center (UAC). The Universal Automation Center enables organizations to orchestrate and automate their IT processes, jobs, and tasks across multiple systems and environments. The UAC helps streamline operations, reduce manual intervention, and improve the overall efficiency of IT infrastructure. Some key features of Stonebranch’s UAC include real-time automation, centralized control, and scalability.

User Ratings:

PeerSpot:3.8 out of 5 based on 4 reviews.¹⁹

G2: 4.5/5 based on 71 reviews.²⁰

TrustRadius: It does not have enough ratings to provide an overall score.

Pros

• StoneBranch offers comprehensive automation support for various environments, including cloud, multi-cloud, and on-premise setups. 
• It provides the flexibility to enable or disable automation effortlessly, allowing you to establish automation sequences throughout your system. 
• StoneBranch excels at consolidating your automation efforts, even in complex network configurations.

Cons

• It can be hard to manage the task monitor.
• Universal Automation Center could improve the analytics.
• Their market presence is not up to par with tools such as ActiveBatch, RunMyjobs, etc.

You can check our comprehensive workload automation list to have access to over 20 vendors with a strong market presence.

Find the Right Vendors

External Links

1. Broadcom.“Broadcom to Acquire CA Technologies for $18.9 Billion in Cash”
2. Peerspot. AutoSys
3. G2.AutoSys
4. Trustradius. AutoSys
5. PeerSpot. AutoSys
6. PeerSpot. ActiveBatch
7. G2. ActiveBatch
8. Trustradius. ActiveBatch
9. PeerSpot. RunMyJobs
10. G2. RunMyJobs
11. Trustradius. RunMyJobs
12. Software Advice, JAMS Scheduler
13. PeerSpot. JAMS Scheduler
14. G2. JAMS Scheduler
15. TrustRadius. JAMS Scheduler
16. PeerSpot. Control-M by BMC
17. G2. Control-M by BMC
18. Trustradius. Control-M by BMC
19. PeerSpot. StoneBranch
20. G2. StoneBranch